Why The IAEA Claim Of No Harm In Fukushima Is Wrong
Portions of the new IAEA report on Fukushima have been criticized by the media and roundly slammed by Greenpeace. Much
Read morePortions of the new IAEA report on Fukushima have been criticized by the media and roundly slammed by Greenpeace. Much
Read moreWe have a wide variety of data on human exposures due to the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster. That data will
Read moreThis is part three of our three part series on the second year of the 3-11 disaster. In part three
Read moreTEPCO’s efforts to avoid outside inspections of the unit 1 reactor have caught up with them. After it was recently
Read moreNamie town has teamed up with Hirosaki University to do independent examinations for any children from the town who want
Read moreNews articles newer than 2013 can be found in our Dropbox archive. If you need downloadable copies of any of
Read moreAn article by Richard Muller at the WSJ has been making the rounds, lauded by the nuclear industry and creating
Read moreIn a long list of bad actions by the Nuclear Emergency Response Headquarters, that has been in charge of radiation dose
Read moreThe prefectural government in Fukushima terminated an exposure study of local residents. They said the study “might fuel concern among
Read moreA group of 65 people were tested for radiation exposure by Hirosaki University soon after the disaster. 80% showed some
Read more